Quantcast
Channel: Tamil Nadu
Viewing all 16137 articles
Browse latest View live

TN IAS officer Santhosh Babu who had sought VRS transferred to Handicrafts dept

$
0
0
Controversy
It was speculated that Santhosh Babu who was the principal secretary and MD of the Tamil Nadu Fibre Net Corporation in the IT dept, had been upset over undue pressure on him.
L: Santhosh Babu | R: Hans Raj Varma
IAS officer Santhosh Babu who had sought voluntary retirement last week, has been now posted as the chairman and managing director of Tamil Nadu Handicrafts Development Corporation Limited (TNHDCL) by the state government. Among the many positions he was holding, he was also the additional in-charge of the Tamil Nadu Handicrafts Development Corporation (Poompuhar) since September last year. It was speculated that Santhosh, who was the principal secretary and managing director of the Tamil Nadu Fibre Net Corporation in the Information Technology department, had been upset over undue pressure on him from the ruling party to approve a tender. His VRS came as a surprise to many with opposition leader MK Stalin demanding the Chief Minister’s response on the issue. Rural Development and Panchayat Raj secretary Hans Raj Varma will now hold additional charge of Information Technology. In its reshuffling of IAS officers, the state government has also switched the postings of two officers - Apoorva and Mangat Ram Sharma - to take up the other’s posting. Apoorva, who was presently serving as Commissioner of Archives and Historical Research, will now be posted as Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, a post that was previously held by Mangat Ram Sharma, and the latter will now become the Commissioner of Archives and Historical Research. IAS officer MS Shanmugam, who was presently serving as managing director, Tamil Nadu FibreNet Corporation Limited has been transferred to become Commissioner of Museums, a post that was being held as additional charge by T Udhayachandran, Principal Secretary and Commissioner, Department of Archaeology. D Ravichandran, who is presently a Deputy Secretary at the Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, will replace Shanmugam as the Managing Director of Tamil Nadu FibreNet Corporation Limited. D Manikandan, who is on inter-cadre deputation, has been posted as Joint Secretary, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department. KP Karthikeyan, previously Executive Director of TN Guidance Bureau, will now become Executive Director of Tamil Nadu Industrial Development Corporation (TIDCO). S Aneesh Sekhar, the present Executive Director, will take up Karthikeyan’s posting as Executive Director of GUIDANCE Bureau. 
Body 2: 

Chennai police prohibit protests in city again, will court step in?

$
0
0
Law and Order
Activists pointed out in court on Monday that the city police were citing various reasons to repeatedly re-issue these orders.
Image for Representation
The Chennai city police have renewed prohibitory orders for gatherings under Section 41 of the Madras Police Act even as a legal challenge to it was brought before the Madras High Court on Monday. Activists have questioned the purpose of law that prohibits gatherings, citing various reasons. Since the nationwide protests against the controversial Citizenship (Amendment) Act began in December last year, the city police have been detaining and filing cases against protesters under sections of the Act. In a statement to the press on Monday, Chennai police Commissioner AK Vishwanathan stood by orders "regulating processions, demonstrations, fasts, human chain, meetings, assemblies, etc. within Greater Chennai Police jurisdiction" for a period of 15 days beginning 6 pm on January 28 and ending at 6 pm on February 12. "Intending applicants are advised to apply five days clear in advance to enable processing of the requests." the order read. Activists pointed out in court on Monday that the city police were citing various reasons to repeatedly re-issue these orders. The city police have previously claimed that fasts, protests and demonstrations could lead to an obstruction of traffic, cause public inconvenience  and disrupt law and order. Justice P Rajamanickam was hearing a writ petition filed by lawyer and human rights activist Gayatri Khandhadai who argued that the prohibitory orders, issued every 15 days, restricted the constitutional right of citizens to gather and protest peacefully in a democracy. Last month, eight persons including activist Gayatri were detained by the police for drawing kolams on a street in Besant Nagar against the CAA. Although the protesters had informed that they would be drawing kolams on Fourth Main Road in Besant Nagar, they were detained by the city police at a nearby community hall for unlawful assembly. Similarly, the massive DMK-led protest against the law also saw thousands being booked under the Madras Police Act.
Body 2: 

Paranur toll remains non-functional, revenue loss anticipated to be over Rs 70 lakhs

$
0
0
Crime
On Sunday, the toll plaza was vandalised following an exchange between the toll plaza staff members and crew members from a state-owned bus.
Image for Representation | Wikimedia commons/Arjuncm3
The violence on Sunday at Paranur Toll plaza on the outskirts of Chennai has rendered the facility to remain non-functional for a third day in a row on Tuesday. With motorists zipping past without paying toll fee, the revenue loss reportedly amounted to lakhs. According to TOI, the loss in revenue could be at least Rs 70 lakh. On Sunday, the toll plaza was vandalised following an exchange between the toll plaza staff members and crew members from a state-owned bus. The fight broke out when the staff members had reportedly asked the bus to pay the toll charges. According to reports, when the argument turned into an altercation, passengers, crew members from other buses and the public too jumped into the fight, vandalising the facility. The toll plaza staff has lodged a complaint with the police claiming that Rs. 18 lakh was stolen from the counters in the plaza. CCTV footage is being checked to verify the claim. The police reportedly had to fire a round into the air to disperse the crowd. Five persons, including the driver, conductor, and a toll plaza staffer were arrested after the melee. The Paranur toll is among the 13 toll plazas in Tamil Nadu that has been allowed extra time to allow an additional lane to accept cash payment. FASTags became mandatory from January 15 in all toll plazas in the country whereas these 13 tolls will be exempted until February 14. The Union Government had mandated FASTags on all vehicles which use toll plazas from December 1, 2019 with the intention to avoid long waiting lines in toll booths. Just last week, a 55-year-old security guard on the outskirts of Chennai was beaten to death late on Thursday night even as he tried to foil a robbery attempt at a toll plaza. Venkatesan, the security guard, worked at an under-construction toll plaza on Outer Ring Road in Nemilichery near Avadi. When he was on duty on Thursday, a gang of thieves reportedly attempted to rob lorry drivers near the toll plaza. 
Body 2: 

TN CM EPS files two defamation complaints against Stalin for criticising state

$
0
0
Court
DMK chief Stalin had questioned the Centre’s move to rank Tamil Nadu as the leading state in the Good Governance Index and hit out at the state for arresting ‘kolam’ protesters.
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Edappadi K Palaniswami filed two defamation complaints against DMK Chief and Opposition leader MK Stalin. The City Public Prosecutor (CPP) Gowri Ashokan filed these complaints before the Principal Sessions Court. The complaints have been filed in connection with statements made by MK Stalin against Chief Minister Palaniswami. His statements, published in the party mouthpiece Murasoli on January 28, questioned the Centre’s move to rank Tamil Nadu as the leading state in the Good Governance Index.  The DMK Chief also wondered how Tamil Nadu could place first in the category of public security, pointing to the 2019 Pollachi rape case and the killing of protesters during the Sterlite protests in 2018. The complaints also cite another statement by Stalin made on December 30, where he criticised the state government for arresting six protesters for conducting the ‘kolam’ protest in Chennai. The Public Prosecutor said that these statements were highly defamatory and were made with an intent to malign the reputation of Chief Minister. The criminal defamation has been filed under sections 499 and 500 of IPC. The state government had previously filed a defamation case against Tamil newspaper Dinakaran in June last year for allegedly publishing false information about the Chief Minister on the three-language policy which was initially mentioned in the draft National Education Policy. Late AIADMK supremo and former Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa was known for filing multiple defamation cases, many of it against journalists. In August 2016, Jayalalithaa’s government was pulled up by the Supreme Court and a bench of Justices Dipak Misra and C Nagappan, admonishing the state for abusing the tool. The Tamil Nadu government had then told the apex court that a total of 213 defamation cases was filed from 2011-2016 when the AIADMK was in power. Of the 213 cases, 55 were filed against the media. The maximum number of defamation cases were filed against archrival, the DMK, with a total of 85 cases filed between May 2011 and July 2016.   
Body 2: 

Coimbatore trans woman blocked from registering her wedding, approaches Collector

$
0
0
Law
Surega, a trans woman, and Manikandan, a cis man, got married in February 2018, but are yet to get a registration certificate.
For 24-year-old Surega, a Coimbatore-based transgender woman, getting to marry the man she loves was an easier task than obtaining a marriage certificate, which gives legal validity to their marriage. Tired of running from pillar to post since she and Manikandan got married, the couple finally has approached the District Collector with a plea to help them get their marriage registered. Surega and Manikandan (25) got married on February 14, 2018, at a Mariamman temple in Coimbatore. “I don’t have parents and we had to convince his parents to agree to this wedding. They are good people and agreed to us getting married,” she tells TNM. Surega is a milk vendor, while Manikandan drives an auto rickshaw. Like most couples, the duo went to the Registrar’s office inside the Collectorate campus in Coimbatore immediately after their wedding to get it registered. “We both submitted all the documents needed for the official to register the marriage. But he didn’t. Instead, he gave us an objection certificate without stating any reason,” she explains. In fact, the couple also brought up the landmark August 2019 judgment of the Madras High court, that held a marriage between a man and a trans Woman as valid and said that the authorities must register it under section 5 of the Hindu Marriage Act. However, this failed to move the officials in their favour. On January 21, Manikandan filed an online application with the Sub-Registrar’s office in Vadavalli, Coimbatore to get the marriage registered. However, the next day, he received a rejection from the office stating that there is no provision for a trans woman to be a bride as per the Hindu Marriages Act, 1955. “The word Bride as found in section 5(iii) literally means as woman who has just married or is going to be married. The word transgender finds no place in the Act,” reads the letter from the sub-registrar. “All I wanted was to get our marriage registered so that we can be an example to other trans women to show that leading a normal life is possible. But it looks like it is not possible under the law. Aren’t we sufficient citizens to grant us that right?” Surega asks. “Even to adopt a baby later on or to buy a property jointly, this document is the foundation. I want to lead a normal life like other married women, with dignity and respect. Why am I being denied this basic right?” asks Surega. The couple, on Monday, presented a petition to the Coimbatore Collector, requesting his intervention in the matter. TNM has reached out to the District Collector of Coimbatore, the article will be updated as and when TNM gets a response. 
Body 2: 

Why Chennai’s dream of a single transport authority remains unfulfilled

$
0
0
Transportation
Chennai Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority (CUMTA) Act was passed as a radical law to bring all the infrastructure and planning authorities in the city under a single umbrella.
Image: GN Ramaswami
It was expected to radically transform the planning of public transport in Chennai city. But nine years after the Chennai Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority (CUMTA) Act received the Tamil Nadu Governor’s assent in 2011, the nodal body has yet to start functioning and remains only on paper.  Chennai is known for its multiple modes of public transport systems spanning the length and breadth of the city. From the suburban train system, which started operating in the city almost a century ago to the swanky new metro rail, Chennai’s public transport system is considered one of the best in the country. Yet all these public transport modes run in isolation and not in tandem with each other, putting commuters in a difficult position. CUMTA was aimed at addressing these issues and revamping the entire network by bringing all the operators under a single umbrella. A prompt for CUMTA The Chennai Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority (CUMTA) Act was passed in 2011 to serve as a planning agency which would supervise the work of other bodies in the transport sector in Chennai. The roots for a unified transport authority lie in the National Urban Transport Policy (NUTP), which was introduced in 2006 by the Central government. The aim of the policy was to build sustainable urban transport in Indian cities. The 2006 NUTP policy framed by the Centre recommended that a Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority (UMTA) be set up in all cities with a population of over a million people. This entails collaborating with agencies like the World Bank, Global Environment Facility (GEF) and United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) to devise a policy and implement it in the cities. Based on this, the government of Tamil Nadu also passed the CUMTA Act in 2011, which was notified eight years later in 2019. Members in CUMTA According to the Act, CUMTA shall be led by the state Transport Minister and will have member representation from transport, finance, housing and urban development, highways, home, municipal administration and water supply departments and from the Chennai city police, Greater Chennai Corporation, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA), Southern Railway, Metropolitan Transport Corporation (MTC) and Chennai Metro Rail Limited (CMRL). It also states that CUMTA shall act as the coordinating agency in the areas of transport and monitor the implementation of various traffic and transportation measures including promoting public transport systems in the city. According to the Act, the state minister for transport will be the Chairman of CUMTA while the Chief Urban Planner of CMDA will be the Member Secretary of the Authority. This means that he will also be the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Authority, instead of a bureaucrat. Speaking to TNM about the authority, a senior official at the CMDA says that CUMTA was formed with good intentions to optimise the several transport systems in Chennai and help agencies work towards the single aim of developing the city. He, however, observes that in many ways setting up CUMTA was not a voluntary move by the state government.  “It was also because of funding issues and the compulsion by the Union government,” he says. The official also says that setting up CUMTA became inevitable when the conditions for funding by World Bank also underwent changes. “The international funding agencies also started pushing to set up a separate authority so that they can infuse funds directly to the agencies itself instead of routing it through the central or the state governments. Hence, it became imperative to set up CUMTA at least to receive funds from them,” the CMDA source adds. Single umbrella for transport planning Chennai is one of the best examples for a city that has seamless connectivity, says Sivasubramaniam Jayaraman, Manager, Transport Systems in Institute of Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP). At present, the multiple modes of public transport in Chennai are owned and operated by different agencies. The public buses are operated by Metropolitan Transport Corporation (MTC) and the suburban and the Mass Rapid Transit System (MRTS) railway system is being operated by Southern Railways. The metro rail network that runs in two corridors is owned and operated by Chennai Metro Rail Limited (CMRL). Any expansion in the railway network is being done in coordination with agencies like the CMDA for activities like land acquisition. Also, according to a forecast by the CMDA, by 2026, around 65% of all the transportation that will happen in Chennai will be through modes of public transport. To make this a reality, it is imperative to provide seamless connectivity to commuters across various public transport systems, instead of putting them in a difficult spot, looking for last mile connectivity. Especially when the ridership on MTC is falling year on year and CMRL’s ridership is yet to reach anywhere near its peak capacity. And because there are multiple agencies involved, inordinate project delays are inevitable. This in turn impacts the general public who are dependent on public transport systems. CUMTA is meant to address these issues and club all the planning bodies under one umbrella so that all of them can work together when it comes to planning and executing public transport projects. “Any decision for the city will be done in consultation with all the relevant departments. Usually what happens is that when one department undertakes a project, the other department says that they are not aware of it. There is a lot of duplication of work that happens. CUMTA will help agencies to work towards the city,” Sivasubramaniam notes. Adding to this point, the CMDA official points to the example of CMRL’s corridor from Washermanpet to Airport which runs alongside the suburban railway line for most of its length. “If CUMTA was functioning when CMRL was planning its alignment, then it would have recommended that CMRL lay its line on some other lesser serviced part of the city and would have still made the project economically viable to attract funding. The current scenario is that CMRL is pulling people away from suburban railway and not attracting new ones, which is in contradiction to the end goal of making more people use public transport services,” he points out. A year later, CUMTA still crawls An Act that could potentially give a boost to multi-modal transport systems in Chennai, CUMTA still largely remains on paper. Besides notifying the Act and the Rules, nothing much has happened on the ground in relation to the Authority. In fact, CUMTA is yet to convene its first meeting with all its member agencies. The necessity to get CUMTA off the ground was also stressed in a recent meeting on urban mobility in Chennai with officials from the World Bank. In the meeting, World Bank had emphasised routing the funding for all mobility-related projects in the city through a unified authority. It also urged the government to increase the staff strength in the agencies that are working towards promoting urban mobility in the city. In the meeting it was also highlighted that the absence of a CUMTA-like body or a delay in making such a planning authority functional could lead to an illogical planning and execution of infrastructure projects like elevated corridors and pedestrian pathways. The reasons that the Authority is in limbo are many, says the CMDA official. “One reason is that the departments are not willing to give up their power. Till date, they had the sole authority to plan, approve and implement projects. But once CUMTA comes in, the other departments lose their power to plan and approve. They will then be in charge of implementation of what the CUMTA tells them to do, which is a huge step-down. That’s how they see it. Hence the resistance,” he says. Another reason why CUMTA is still struggling to take off as a core planning authority around Chennai city’s transportation systems, according to the official, is the traditional notion that a technical expert cannot lead an agency, says the official. “It has always been the bureaucrats who lead such statutory bodies. So when a person with technical expertise is designated to lead CUMTA, bureaucrats generally don’t take it well and resist,” he explains. Meanwhile Chennai residents associations, however, see CUMTA as a good idea but have expressed their doubts over the inordinate delays in getting the authority moving. “Why is there such a delay in making this happen on ground? And why is the government raking it up now after the delay of almost a decade since the Act was passed?” asks VS Jayaraman, the President of T Nagar Residents Welfare Association. Appreciating the intention behind the formation of CUMTA, Jayaraman also points out that there is no representation from civilians in the authority. “I think CUMTA needs to have representation from residents also since it would lead to more collaboration in the planning stage itself. Absence of inputs from residents groups have only led to a lot of lawsuits which has stalled development works across the city,” he adds. However, the CMDA official says that CUMTA’s first meeting will be convened within April 2020 and from then on, things will move smoothly.   
Body 2: 

Chennai man held for watching child sexual abuse material

$
0
0
Crime
Harish, who was finally nabbed on Tuesday, had used 500 IP addresses, initially browsing at internet cafes.
A 24-year-old man from Chennai has been arrested by the police for possessing and watching child sexual abuse material in the city. According to reports, the man had been indulging in the illegal activity over a period of two years. The arrest came following a tip from the National Crime Records Bureau regarding a phone that had been downloading illegal material. According to the Times of India, S Harish from Ambattur was identified after his phone number matched with the record of the National Centre for Missing and Exploited Children. Harish, who was finally nabbed on Tuesday, had used 500 IP addresses. The unemployed science graduate had reportedly watched the content at browsing centres. According to The New Indian Express, Harish soon began downloading the child sexual abuse material onto his phone and watching it. The Ambattur All Women's police station booked Harish under Section 67(B) of the Information Technology Act (Punishment for publishing or transmitting obscene material in electronic form) and Section 14(1) (Punishment for using child for pornographic purposes) of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. In December last year, the Crime against Women and Children Wing in Tamil Nadu launched a crackdown on those illegally downloading child sexual abuse material on to their phones and computers. In December, a 42-year-old air conditioner mechanic was arrested for allegedly possessing and distributing child sexual abuse material. The man had allegedly used multiple Facebook profiles to share the material, simply creating another ID even if the social media site suspended one account. On January 4, a 23-year-old man from Assam who worked in a tiles factory in Pollachi was arrested for possessing child sexual abuse material. A day later, a bus conductor from Avinashi in Tirupur district was arrested under the POCSO Act.
Body 2: 

Stalin demands CBI probe into TNPSC recruitment scam

$
0
0
Scam
The DMK also demanded the dismissal of D Jayakumar, Minister for Fisheries and Personnel and Administrative Reforms.
DMK chief MK Stalin on Wednesday demanded a CBI probe into the recruitment malpractices in Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission (TNPSC) relating to Group 4 posts. Recently, the state government agency became embroiled in a controversy when it emerged that as many as 35 candidates in the top 100 rankers in the list are from two specific locations in Tamil Nadu - Rameswaram and Keelakarai.  In a statement issued in Chennai, Stalin said the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) should probe the TNPSC recruitment scam. He also said in order to restore the unemployed youths' confidence in TNPSC, the probe should be monitored by a High Court judge. According to Stalin, the government has said that during 2018-19, a total of 17,648 persons have been recruited through TNPSC exams in various cadres including Group IV, while the total recruitment during the AIADMK rule from 2017-2019 was 22,250 persons. Stalin said suspicion arises as to the kind of transparency that was followed in the recruitments made between 2017 and 2019 given the recruitment scam that has come to light now. Stalin, who is Leader of the Opposition in the Tamil Nadu Assembly, also demanded the dismissal of D Jayakumar, Minister for Fisheries and Personnel and Administrative Reforms. According to TNPSC, the recruitment exam for 9,398 vacancies under Group IV category was held on September 1, 2019. A total of 16,29,865 aspirants appeared in the exam. The TNPSC said a complaint was lodged as the first 100 ranks were secured by those who wrote the exam in Rameswaram and Keezhakarai centres in Ramanathapuram district. A probe revealed that 99 persons, on the advice of middlemen, had opted for exam centres in Rameswaram and Keezhakarai and had first marked their answers with an ink that would vanish after sometime. Later, with the help of those involved in the conduct of exams and the middlemen, correct answers were marked in the answer sheets. Announcing a probe, the TNPSC said that it would first verify all the answer sheets of the 497 candidates who have been called for the certificate verification process after qualifying for the Group 4 exams of the Commission.  (With IANS input) 
Body 2: 

Challenge to Kanimozhi’s LS win politically motivated: DMK after court stays Madras HC case

$
0
0
Court
Kanimozhi’s election was challenged by a voter on the grounds that she failed to mention her husband's PAN number in her election affidavit.
The Supreme Court on Thursday stayed the Madras High Court proceedings on a petition challenging the election of DMK leader Kanimozhi from Thoothukudi constituency in Tamil Nadu. A bench comprising Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justices BR Gavai and Surya Kant took note of the submissions of the DMK leader's lawyer and stayed the ongoing proceedings before the Madras High Court. The matter is set to come up in the apex court in four weeks. Kanimozhi contested from the Thoothukudi constituency in 2019 and her election was challenged by a voter, A Santhana Kumar, on the grounds that she failed to mention her husband's Permanent Account Number (PAN) in her election affidavit disclosing family assets. Soon after her loss against the DMK MP with a 3.47-lakh vote margin, the former Tamil Nadu BJP chief and current Telangana Governor Tamilisai Soundarajan alleged discrepancies in Kanimozhi’s nomination papers as well. The BJP leader alleged that the four nomination papers she had filed in support of her application were inconsistent with each other – they had reportedly mentioned different Assembly constituencies where Kanimozhi had registered as a voter. The BJP had flayed the Returning Officer for not having rejected the nomination papers. Tamilisai approached the Madras High Court but later withdrew the case after her appointment as Telangana Governor.  Meanwhile, the DMK has said that the petitioner, a resident of Thoothukudi, had not disclosed his membership of the BJP. Rejecting the MP's objections, the court held that a member of a political party was free to file an election petition before the court. Kanimozhi had reportedly stated in her reply that her husband was not in possession of a PAN card as he remains an NRI based out of Singapore. In November last year, the Madras High Court dismissed a request by Kanimozhi to reject petitioner Santhana Kumar’s plea challenging her win.  Speaking to TNM, senior counsel and DMK Rajya Sabha MP P Wilson said, “The election case is frivolous. A BJP voter has raised the challenge. His ground is that the DMK MP’s husband’s PAN number is not declared. He is working abroad, which she herself has stated in her papers. Only a person whose income is assessed in India can have a PAN. So we have said in the nomination form that it is not applicable to her case. Secondly, with regard to where she is contesting, she has rightly filled in her nomination form as Thoothukudi.” “Election petitions can be tried strictly in accordance with the statutory provisions and not based on common law . Thus, these two allegations which don't fit into any of statutes, are untenable and politically motivated,” he added.   (With PTI inputs)
Body 2: 

Kalakshetra cancels TM Krishna's book launch upset over excerpt on cow, caste and music

$
0
0
Controversy
There is nothing controversial about the dichotomy between cow worship and needing cow skin for the mridangam, TM Krishna reacted.
In a sudden move, Kalakshetra Foundation, the Chennai-based arts and culture academy, has withdrawn permission to conduct Carnatic singer TM Krishna’s book launch event at its premises, citing fears of ‘political, cultural and social disharmony.’ The book launch, originally scheduled to take place at the academy’s auditorium, has now been shifted to the Asian College of Journalism in Chennai’s Taramani on February 2. Titled Sebastian and Sons, TM Krishna’s new book is a ‘brief history’ of the makers of the mridangam, the Carnatic percussion instrument.   In a letter to Westland Publications, Revathi Ramachandran, the Director of Kalakshetra Foundation, said, “Kalakshetra Foundation is an autonomous body under Ministry of Culture, Government of India. Being a Government organisation, it cannot allow any program that may instigate political, cultural and social disharmony.”   The move by the autonomous body, which falls under the Government of India’s Ministry of Culture, has taken the singer and author by shock. The decision follows the publication in The Hindu on Tuesday of an excerpt of the book titled ‘Keeping the cow and brahmin apart’. With the world of Carnatic music being dominated by Brahmins, the book discusses the role of mridangam makers, who are primarily from Dalit communities. The excerpted portion of the book in the newspaper addresses the question of cow worship by Brahmins while the mridangam, played by the community, is made of cow skin. Specifically, it refers to the reluctance of celebrated Brahmin artistes like Palghat Mani Iyer in acknowledging that the mridangam meant needing the skin of the cow.   “The book review which has appeared today in the newspaper contains certain statements relating to the book which touch controversial issues and certainly have a lot of political overtones. We were unaware of the controversies surrounding the subject matter of the book at the time of renting of auditorium for the book release,” Kalakshetra said, withdrawing permission given for use of its auditorium.   ‘Their loss’   Speaking to TNM, singer-author TM Krishna says that it is time to confront uncomfortable realities. “We use cow skin to make these instruments. If the skin is not procured, these instruments cannot be made. It is wrong to say that we can't discuss the politics around it. We have to. The same mridangam is played on the Kalakshetra stage, the same mridangam is what (Kalakshetra founder and Bharatanatyam dancer) Rukmini Devi danced to. The mridangam originates in the slaughterhouse. This is just reality. If we can't talk about cow politics, will they stop playing the mridangam tomorrow?” he asks.   Explaining the idea behind the book, Krishna says that it is to celebrate the mridangam makers who are subject to social marginalisation. He says, “It is messy, but isn't that what art and culture is about? To call something controversial because we're uncomfortable with it is a trope. There is nothing controversial about the dichotomy between cow worship and needing cow skin for the mridangam. This is about human beings who go through all that struggle to make it.”   When asked about his response to Kalakshetra, Krishna says that the organisation has lost out on the opportunity to pay its respects to the makers. “It is their loss. Kalakshetra would have been a great place for all them to come and give the makers the stage they deserve,” he adds.   A portion of the excerpt reads, "The cow is removed from the artist’s sight. Since the killing and skinning happen beyond his circle of existence, he can act as if it does not happen. The maker stands at the threshold, keeping the cow and the brahmin apart, helping the latter maintain his ‘purity’. So, the maker is vital for the player, yet his role also keeps the maker ‘polluted’ and unequal. Once the blood is removed, the skin is cleaned and cut in shape, then dried and finally brought to the artist, it has been transformed through the labour of the makers into a resource, a lifeless ingredient. To Ravikumar, the maker, the skin itself has life; one to which no negativity is attached because it comes alive through shruti."
Body 2: 

Why Rajinikanth became a ‘money lender’ in 2004: Experts take a guess

$
0
0
Controversy
Experts whom TNM reached out to said that claiming to be a money lender is one way of ‘creative accounting’ that is practiced by some people.
Courtesy: PTI
In the last few days, it has been revealed that Superstar and ever aspiring politician Rajinikanth had an ‘oops!’ moment with the Income Tax department some 15 years ago. And while the Income Tax was hell bent on making him pay up some Rs 66 lakh all these years, the case has been withdrawn, and Rajini is presumably debt free as far as the state exchequer is concerned. However, it now appears that around the same time as his misadventures with the I-T department, Rajinikanth also became a self proclaimed money lender.  Mohamed Imranullah S wrote exclusively in The Hindu that Rajinikanth had claimed to be in the ‘money lending business’, according to tax assessment reports that the newspaper has accessed. Apparently, the actor told the I-T department that he lent money to his friends for an interest, and claimed income and losses from this business. Further, he told the I-T department that he was lending money at an interest rate of 18%. However, the Income Tax department, back in 2005, did not accept his claim that this was a business, and suspected that he was only claiming to be a money lender in order to write off ‘bad debts’. So was Rajinikanth a money lender or not? The actor has not commented on the issue yet, and considering the Income Tax department has decided to withdraw their case against him, we’ll perhaps not get a statement from them either. However, TNM spoke to experts on what it means to be a money lender, as far as tax benefits are concerned. And while these experts cannot comment on what Rajinikanth is or isn’t into, they said that sometimes, ‘money lending’ activities fall in the realm of creative accounting. A senior chartered accountant, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said, “We do not know the specifics of Rajinikanth’s case of course, but in some cases, when people face losses – either because they gave money to someone personally or for other reasons, they try to offset the loss by calling it a business loss. Basically, if you lose money as an individual, it’s just money you’ve lost. But if you’re a money lender and you’ve lost money, it’s a business loss, that can be accounted for while filing returns.” “It’s not tax evasion, but could be considered tax avoidance,” another tax expert said, while reiterating that he did not know the specifics in this particular case. ‘18% rate of interest’ triggers row Meanwhile, the report that Rajinikanth told the Income Tax department he was lending money at an interest rate of 18% has shocked many people, and outraged others. Many people tweeted with #கந்துவட்டி – loosely translating to ‘loan shark Rajini’ – to express their disapproval for the rate of interest supposedly charged by the aspiring politician. Kandhu Vatti, or loans at high rates of interest, is a big issue in Tamil Nadu, where a family of four killed themselves in front of a Collector’s office because they were being troubled by loan sharks. The reference to Kanthu Vatti meanwhile brought about another hashtag from Rajini’s supporters, who tweeted with #மக்களுக்காக_ரஜினி, or ‘Rajini for the People’. What the case is about The Income Tax department in 2004 suspected that Rajinikanth had not declared his full income for the assessment years 2002-03, 2003-04 and 2004-05. In February 2005, they did a survey of his properties, and found that while he had accounted for a lost of costs as his professional costs, less than a tenth of his properties were actually used for his profession. Further, when the I-T department asked Rajinikanth whether he was in the business of money lending, he initially denied it. Later however, he wrote to the Income Tax department and said he was indeed a money lender, and that he had lent money at an interest rate of 18% as a source of income. Following the survey, Rajinikanth was forced to file revised returns for the three years in question, and declared a higher income than earlier. But the I-T department contended that since he filed revised returns only after they surveyed him, he should be penalised – an amount of Rs 66 lakh is what the department wanted as a fine. Rajinikanth and his lawyers contested this, and this week, the I-T department has written off the fine amount.  Coincidentally, 2004 was just two years after Baba, the high-budget film, produced by Rajinikanth himself, tanked at the box office. Rajinikanth also took a brief break from acting in its aftermath.
Body 2: 

Two persons arrested in Rameswaram for selling crow meat to chicken stalls

$
0
0
Crime
These stalls allegedly mix the crow meat with chicken before selling it to roadside eateries.
Two people were arrested on Thursday for allegedly killing crows and selling their meat to chicken stalls in Rameswaram. The police have seized around 150 dead birds from the accused. This horrific killing of crows for food came to light when pilgrims at the temple town noticed the birds dying after feeding on the rice offered by them in memory of their forefathers. Authorities were quickly alerted. The officials conducted an enquiry and found that the birds died after consuming liquor-laced food offered by the poachers, who sold their meat to chicken stalls. These stalls then mixed the crow meat with chicken meat, before selling it to roadside eateries, they added. Police are likely to investigate road side eateries for further information on the use of crows as a substitute for chicken. According to reports, the accused in the case allegedly laced food with liquor as opposed to casting a net to catch the crows, to avoid detection. The birds were then covered in a sack till they became completely unconscious. In November 2019, Chennai saw a similar scare when officials from the Food Safety Department discovered over 2000 kilograms of rotting meat in a train from Jodhpur to Chennai. In addition to failing to follow the protocol for shipping of meat, there was also suspicions that the consignment was dog meat. The long tails on the carcasses led to panic amongst people who keenly studied the images. It took five days for the Food Safety department to declare that the suspicions were wrong. A carcass was sent to the Tamil Nadu Veterinary and animal sciences university, with a request for identification of the species. A molecular technique along with a study of the anatomical features resulted in the conclusion that it was either sheep or goat. (With inputs from PTI)
Body 2: 

Sasikala's brother hails DMK Chief, says Stalin will become CM

$
0
0
Politics
His statement has led to speculation over whether Dhivaharan will jump ship ahead of his sister's release from jail.
With barely over a year left for the VK Sasikala's jail sentence in the Parappana Agrahara jail to end, her brother V Dhivaharan has made a startling statement. Speaking at a wedding on Thursday, Dhivaharan hailed DMK chief MK Stalin as the state's next Chief Minister and claimed that he will uphold Dravidian principles. The statement was made when he was sharing a dias with the DMK Chief during the wedding of a family member of Thanjavur DMK MP S Palanimanickam."Stalin is the Leader of Opposition today and will be the Chief Minister tomorrow," said Dhivaharan. "The situation in Tamil Nadu is bad and people here are being treated like second-class citizens. Even a man from Karnataka (referring to actor Rajinikanth) is now brave enough to speak against Periyar. This situation has come because Dravidian leaders have passed away, one after the other. Tamil and Tamil Nadu are both important to us. Stalin is the only leader who can protect them and we should support him," he added. He however did go on to criticise the DMK and stated that had its leaders remained vigilant, the party could have secured close to 85% of the seats. Responding to this, Stalin who spoke next, claimed that the party would have won 90% of the seats if elections were conducted in a free and fair manner. He also pointed out that BJP's T Arasukumar, who had praised him at a similar event at a wedding, had switched to the DMK after this speech. He maintained that he was not sure where Dhivaharan was headed next. And while this has led to speculation over whether Dhivaharan will jump ship ahead of his sister's release, AIADMK which ousted the family from the party, used this as an opportunity to point out why they removed Sasikala."As far as that family is concerned, they always have a link with DMK. Be it Dhivaharan, Dhinakaran or Sasikala, they have a soft corner for DMK," said D Jayakumar, AIADMK Minister to the media after Dhivaharan's statement. However Dhivaharan's son Jeyanandh, in a statement on Facebook about the event said, "It is uncultured to rake up a 30-year-old feud at a marriage event. Even if it is a leader who you oppose politically, if they have invited you it is Tamil culture to honour them. That is all that has happened. Nothing has changed because of this event. We will not support the DMK."   
Body 2: 

Watch: How walkable is Chennai city?

$
0
0
Urban infrastructure
In 2014, Chennai became the first in India to come up with a policy that aimed to prioritise its pedestrians. More than 5 years later, is Chennai pedestrian-friendly?
To be a pedestrian in Chennai is sometimes no different from being in an obstacle course. Where footpaths exist, pedestrians have to often hop, skip, and jump over obstructions or broken platforms. But more often than not, people are forced to walk on the road, putting them in harm’s way.  More than 1,600 pedestrians have been killed in Chennai between 2015 and 2018, making the city one of the deadliest in the country for those on foot. This is despite Chennai being the first in India to come up with a non-motorised transport policy in 2014, that aimed to prioritise pedestrians, and make the city more walkable.  “A walkable city is one where an 8-year-old child or an 80-year-old woman can safely and conveniently walk to all the destinations that they have to go to. This is a city where the footpaths are uninterrupted, they span a width of as much as 1.8m in residential areas and as much as 4metres in commercial areas. These are streets where the footpaths are well-shaded so it is comfortable for the person to walk, it is well-lit so it is safe for women to use the space even at night,” says Aswathy Dilip, Senior Program Manager at Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP). Hailed as progressive at the time, the 2014 non-motorised transport policy set ambitious goals for Chennai. That by 2018, 80% of all streets in the city would have footpaths, over 40% of trips would be by walk or cycle, and that Chennai would completely eliminate pedestrian deaths.  But over five years after the policy came out, these targets are still a work in progress.   “Since the policy, we have added something like 300 to 400 km of platforms. We have an aim of having this platform on large roads, medium roads and small roads – wherever it is possible. The corporation maintains a total length of 6,000 km of roads all put together. But most of these 6,000 km would be lanes and bylanes where there won’t be any necessity or possibility of constructing platforms. Therefore, we are restricting to 1,500 km of roads where this can be constructed.” Says G Prakash, Chennai Corporation Commissioner.   Watch:
Body 2: 

'There was no woman cop': says lone woman detained for anti-CAA protest in Chennai

$
0
0
CAA
The protestors were detained despite having permission to hold a memorial meet to observe 5 minutes of silence on Mahatma Gandhi's death anniversary.
A lone female protester who was detained by the Chennai police has alleged that she was put in a van with 12 men on Thursday evening.  The incident happened at around 5 pm near the Gandhi Mandapam statue in Adyar on Thursday, where a group of anti-CAA protesters had gathered for a memorial meet to observe 5 minutes of silence on Mahatma Gandhi's death anniversary, as a mark of registering their dissent against CAA and NRC.  Within a few minutes of the meet, police officers from the Kotturpuram police station who were deployed at the site took 8 men and the woman into custody and forcefully dispersed the others who had gathered at the site of the meet. "Me and 8 others (men) had been standing further away from the protest site. The officers from the Kotturpuram police station suddenly started rounding us up and pushing us into a van. A female officer got me into the van. But after that she vanished. Inside the van, there were 8 male protestors and 4 male police officers and me.  We were driven to a community hall in Kotturpuram with no female police officer in sight," the woman told TNM. She added that two women police officers arrived at the community hall, 2 hours later, to collect her personal details.  Sudha Ramalingam, senior lawyer and human rights activist told TNM, "Although it is not expressly mentioned in the CrPC sections governing the arrest of women, female police officers should accompany women when being detained. In this incident, although the woman officer accompanied her till the police van near Gandhi Mandapam, the police officers have shown utter gender insensitivity by leaving her in the custody of all male officers, that too in Chennai, a city where there are atleast 30 all women’s police station." The memorial meet was organised by 'Platform against Fascism' and the organisers say that prior permission had been taken from the Mylapore DCP to organise the protest.  However, it was shifted to Gandhi Mandapam in Kotturpuram as per a request by the Mylapore police."We were initially planning the meet at Gandhi Statue in Marina. Then the Mylapore police called us to the station on Wednesday to discuss the event we were planning.  They asked why the organisation was called Platform against 'Fascism' and why we were protesting against the CAA," Shreela, a lawyer who represented one of the organisers told TNM.'Preventive action'  On Wednesday, a day before the meet, the Mylapore DCP  issued show cause notice to one of the organisers - Sathish, and imposed a security bond of Rs 50,000 to ensure 'good conduct' from him."After a lot of back and forth, Sathish eventually signed the show cause notice after the DCP promised to arrange another venue for the memorial meet. He asked us to meet at Gandhi Mandapam and we shifted the venue. But before we could start the meet, the police clamped down on us," Shreeja added. Shreela also alleged that the show cause notice was entirely arbitrary and offered only 24 hours to Sathish to respond to it. TNM contacted the Mylapore Assistant Commission of Police who said that the show cause notice was a regular preventive measure taken by the police. TNM also contacted the Kotturpuram ACP who refused to comment on the incident.  (With inputs from Anjana Shekhar)   
Body 2: 

TNM Fact Check: Chinese ship with medical waste did not dock in Chennai port

$
0
0
Fake news
The fake news that had spread on social media forced the Chennai Port Trust to issue a statement debunking the information.
Image for Representation
Fake news of a Chinese ship carrying medical waste, docking in a Chennai port spread like wildfire on social media on Thursday. Such was the proliferation of this information on social media that some Tamil newspapers and channels began to report it and the frenzy surrounding it. The information created panic because China is currently battling the highly infectious Coronavirus. Over 7,700 cases have been recorded worldwide and deaths have reportedly surpassed 200. Several Twitter handles tagged the Chennai Port Trust and demanded to know whether the information they were getting via WhatsApp and other social media platforms were true. @PortofChennai TN media is reporting that a Ship carrying medical waste came from China arrived at Chennai Port. Kindly clarify whether it is true ? If true then send it back. This is not a good news at the time of #CoronavirusOutbreak ?#coronavirusindia#coronaviruschina — Dharmarajan (@iamdharmarajan2) January 30, 2020 மருத்துவக் கழிவுகளுடன் சென்னை கடலுக்கு வந்துள்ள சீனக் கப்பலை துறைமுகத்துக்குள் அனுமதிக்கக்கூடாது. மருத்துவக் கழிவுகளை இறக்க அனுமதிப்பது மோசமான விளைவுகளை ஏற்படுத்தி விடும். உடனடியாக சீன மருத்துவக் கழிவு கப்பலை சென்னை கடல் பகுதியில் இருந்து வெளியேற்ற மத்திய அரசு ஆணையிட வேண்டும்! — Dr S RAMADOSS (@drramadoss) January 30, 2020 The Chennai Port Trust was finally forced to issue a statement debunking the information in order to put the rumours to rest. “With reference to the news item carried by some newspapers/media under the heading 'Medical waste from China brought to Chennai' it is clarified that there is no such information of any ship from China carrying medical waste coming to Chennai port,” authorities clarified in a statement. They further added that, “As regards to any cargo arriving at Chennai port, customs authorities are permitting the cargo to be released only after proper screening, physical examination and clearance from relevant statutory authorities such as Food Safety and Standard Authority of India (FSSAI), plant and animal quarantine and drug control. The Pollution Control Board (PCB) officials also inspected the Chennai port and found the news item is false.” The Chennai port, however, remains on high alert and all ships and crew coming from China are being screened. Much like the city's airport, the port too has quarantine facilities and will be sending any suspected cases to the Rajiv Gandhi General Hospital. On Thursday, the Union Health Ministry confirmed that a student in Kerala has contracted Coronavirus, making it the country's first case. The Kerala government also confirmed the case. “One positive case of Novel Coronavirus patient, of a student studying in Wuhan University, has been reported in Kerala. The patient has tested positive for Novel Coronavirus and is in isolation in the hospital. The patient is stable and is being closely monitored,” the government release stated. The student who was tested positive was one among four students who had been kept in isolation at the Thrissur General Hospital. Six more people are in isolation wards in other hospitals in the state. 
Body 2: 

3 former judges protest along with lawyers on campus, Madras HC calls for security review

$
0
0
Court
Three former Justices of the Madras High Court took part in a peace march along with lawyers on Wednesday. The court termed this ‘unfortunate’.
Twitter: @lizsesh
The Madras High Court on Friday called upon the court's Security Commission to review security arrangements at its premises following a peace march on Thursday. The peace march to commemorate Martyr's Day, carried out by lawyers and three former Justices of the Madras High Court was termed 'unfortunate' by the court. The Security Committee was asked to coordinate with the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu as well as top officials of the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF).  The court took a serious view of the incident even as Justice Subramonium Prasad was hearing suo motu a writ petition pertaining to common security arrangements for premises in and around the High Court. Noting that the Supreme Court is already considering the proposal to deploy paramilitary force in high courts around the country, the court referred to a letter from Deputy Commissioner of Police, High Court Security. The letter stated that senior advocates and three former Justices of the Madras High Court— Hariparanthaman, Kannan and Akbar— had walked in procession to North Gate, and proceeded to enter the court, ending their march at the Ambedkar statue in its premises.  The letter alleged, “They were stopped and advised for their unauthorized activities. But they refused to hear the Police Officers who were on duty.” On Friday, the court said, “Having noticed the said incident reported, what is of more concern is that the incident involves and names three former High Court Judges of having entered the premises and joined the protest that was going on.” Asserting that the incident requires 'immediate concern to be taken up on the administrative side', the court further said, “The gravity of the said incident, therefore, puts on guard the entire judicial system, as this may have a large impact on the future security measures that may be required to be undertaken by the High Court.” The court requested the Security Committee of the High Court to “take up the matter urgently along with its suggestions and report the matter back for taking appropriate action on the judicial side or otherwise by the next date fixed.” The court recorded the Advocate General's submission that with 500 chambers of lawyers on campus, adjustments may have to be made for their clients. It is also noted the Additional Solicitor General of India's submission that CISF security measures have not been standardised on 'account of two zones of operation within the premises'.  “The coordination, therefore, being lacking and the same standard not being deployed may be a cause of concern in future. He, therefore, submits that the operational systems to be followed have to be synchronized in a manner that the security of the entire premises, keeping in view the threat perceptions that keep on arising and taking into concern such other incidents, have to be standardised.” the court observed.  Significantly, the court 'instructed' reporting agencies in its orders on Friday 'not to report anything beyond what is recorded in the order, so as to create any misconception or confusion.'
Body 2: 

How a gate installed by an army academy in Chennai has affected local residents

$
0
0
Human interest
The families own land in St Thomas Mount, around which the Officers Training Academy developed. But three years ago, a gate was installed and residents began to feel the strain.
The settlement nestled in a corner of the OTA campus/Image: Megha Kaveri
Sixty-eight-year-old Uma Gandhi still remembers that day vividly: It was a few days before Christmas last year and she was going on about her daily routine. Suddenly, she felt dizzy and fainted in her house. However, her ordeal did not end there. Uma had to walk over a kilometre in her weak condition, because a gate, installed around three years ago, prevented an ambulance from reaching her house.  “Since we don’t have a car with us, we had to make her walk till the gate though she was in a precarious position,” her son Rajkumar recalls.  This has been a problem for around 15 families who live in Thulasingapuram, near the Officers Training Academy in Chennai. Their houses were built on their own land, for which pattas were granted to their ancestors in 1919. But for the last few years, they have been facing a challenging situation around their own homes.  The Officers Training Academy (OTA) was set up in 1963 near St Thomas Mount to train cadet officers for the Indian Army. Spread across 750 acres, the OTA’s compound surrounded the Thulasingapuram settlement as well. For years they had easy access to their homes but three years ago, OTA installed a gate for ‘security purposes’ and residents began to feel the strain.  The gate is located around a kilometre from the Thulasingapuram settlement and has security personnel guarding it round the clock. OTA hasn’t just installed a new gate. It’s also closed an easy access path used by the residents of Thulasingapuram, restricting their mobility.  The access path which was used by Thulasingapuram residents now closed by the OTA/Image: Megha Kaveri ‘Seems like house arrest’ “Life has become very difficult for us here since that gate was put in place,” says Senthilkumari. The 39-year-old woman was born and brought up in Thulasingapuram, and now lives with her extended family.  “We are not able to bring items from the ration shop in an auto because those at the gate ask the Aadhaar card of the auto driver for identity proof. So we are forced to carry things from the gate till our homes. It is the same problem with the man who supplies the gas cylinders. How can we bring the cylinder back to our houses from the gate when it is so heavy?” she asks. Even the postman, the staff from the electricity board who takes meter readings and ambulances can’t enter through the gate due to the restrictions imposed by OTA security personnel.  “Most of us youngsters have moved out of this area, leaving our own houses and are staying in rented houses nearby just for the ease of mobility,” says Dinesh Kumar, 34. “When we were here, we had to lose a day's job if a gas cylinder was being supplied that day or if we had to buy ration items for the family. It is extremely restrictive,” he explains, adding that they have been paying all the necessary tax to the cantonment.  Dinesh recently moved out to a rented house, where he pays Rs 7,500 a month. “It is expensive for us to lead this life since that rent is an avoidable expense if things were normal here,” he adds.  Officials unresponsive Though residents have made multiple requests to the OTA to restore their access prior to installing the gate, Dinesh Kumar says that there has been no response from officials. “They don’t even tell us whom to go and meet. The OTA is completely closed for us to even ask for contact numbers or persons whom we can approach with our grievances,” says Senthilkumari. She adds that despite a few media houses writing about their situation, not a single officer has visited them or called them to talk.  MSD Thenraja, the Vice President of the Cantonment Board, tells TNM that the OTA did not heed to the residents plea to not close the access road and not install a gate. “We told them when they set the gate up. But they (OTA) didn’t listen to us. Now we are discussing getting another piece of land elsewhere so that these families can live at peace at least there,” he says.  But for these families, an alternate piece of land is only partial solace. “Our ancestors served in the military and were given this land around 100 years ago. Why should we think of moving? OTA came much later and developed around us. Aren’t we entitled to at least access roads like how we had before? This is unfair,” rues Senthilkumari.
Body 2: 

Tamil rapper detained in Chennai, even before he could join anti-CAA gathering

$
0
0
CAA
Nithish, whose phone was seized during the incident and still remains with the police as of Friday evening, tells TNM that the experience was distressing.
Chennai police detained a group of anti-Citizenship Amendment Act protesters who had gathered at Gandhi Manadapam on Thursday to register their dissent against discriminatory policies like the CAA, NRC and NPR. While 9 of the protesters were detained and let off in a few hours, Tamil rapper Nithish and his friend were picked up from outside the venue, were allegedly singled out and made to wait for many hours. “We were not allowed to ask questions and when we did they asked us to just sit quietly,” says Nithish. The two were allowed to leave only after 11 pm, 5 hours after they were detained.  Nithish, whose phone was seized during the incident and still remains with the police as of Friday evening, tells TNM that the experience was distressing. “Who are you? Where are you from? What is your ambition? Why is your hairstyle like this? Are you going to become a porali (revolutionery)? Why do you want to spoil your future?” These are some of the questions the police had asked him says Nithish. He was asked to collect his phone from the station the next day along with a family member. “I told them that I wanted to see what was happening since I was invited by one of the organisers. I was also planning to perform,” says the 24-year-old. Nithish, a B Com student from MKB Nagar in Chennai adds that he had written an anti-CAA rap song that he was going to perform for the first time at the gathering.    Shreela, a lawyer and a protest organiser says the police had no right to detain them separately. “I think they may have looked vulnerable to be picked upon. Did the police keep them longer than necessary since he told that that he was a rapper from North Chennai?” she asks.   Shreela who is now working on getting his phone back also demands an apology from the police. “I am trying to gather a group of layers to question the police on what grounds they detained the two of them separately. They were kept aside and we were deliberately misled and made to believe that no one else was detained at the station. I believe there is a sinister motive behind all this,” she adds. She is also hoping to gather rappers and indie artists from the city to organise a larger protest outside the police station.  TNM was unable to reach Kotturpuram ACP KN Sudharsan for comment despite multiple attempts.  On Thursday evening, the police took 8 men and a woman into custody and forcefully dispersed the others who had gathered at the site of the meet. The lack of a woman police while detaining a woman protester was criticised by those present.  The memorial meet was organised by 'Platform against Fascism' and the organisers say that prior permission had been taken from the Mylapore DCP to organise the protest.  However, it was shifted to Gandhi Mandapam in Kotturpuram as per a request by the Mylapore police. 'There was no woman cop': says lone woman detained for anti-CAA protest in Chennai 
Body 2: 

Chennai family awaits judgment in case where 17 men allegedly raped a child

$
0
0
Crime
The judgment is set to come on Feb 1, the survivor's sister spoke to TNM on the emotional trauma the family underwent.
"Will the Judge think I am a bad girl uncle, if I tell her what happened to me?" This was the question that 11-year-old Priya* posed to her advocate N Ramesh before she gave her statement before a judge at the Mahila court. The young child, who has a hearing disability had allegedly been raped by 17 persons, who were all employed at the apartment complex that she lived in at Ayanavaram in Chennai.  And while the multiple rapes allegedly took place between January and July of 2018, the minor was forced to relive its sordid details in court this last year, many times."Every one of the accused had a different lawyer and she was cross examined by 16 advocates, " says advocate Ramesh. "The judge of course restricted several questions, but she was still forced to hear them and had to cope with the shame she had internalised since the rape began. There is nothing worse than a child blaming herself for a crime committed against her," he adds. But Priya's ordeal is finally coming to a conclusion on February 1, close to a year since the trial in her case began, with the court set to pronounce its verdict on Saturday. According to her advocate Priya was sexually assaulted, raped and even gang raped in a building she called her home, by men aged between 23 and 65. They worked as security guards, lift operators and in the housekeeping department. In her statement she says she was threatened by the accused who said that her family will be murdered if she revealed what was happening to her. It took Priya five months to open up to her elder sister, Anuja*, who had come home for a holiday. Speaking to TNM, Anuja says, her sister's nightmare transformed into slander and many times stigma."In our case, my 11-year-old sister was blamed by the society," she points out. "They questioned her character, I mean, she was 11 for god’s sake. "The parents residing in the apartment kept their kids away from my sister. What did they think playing with a rape victim would result in?" she asks. The family moved away from the building a month after they gave a police complaint about the rape. According to the sister and Ramesh, a few lawyers of the accused alleged that the child and her family were 'immoral' and that the parents had knowingly engaged Priya in prostitution."We almost broke down in the court during the process," says Anuja. "We haven’t had a proper night’s sleep and we won’t until the little girl gets the justice she deserves," she adds. Anuja however, says she is proud of the fight her sister has put up and the strength she displayed even when questioned multiple times. She believes the verdict in the case will be a catalyst for change."Maybe they (society) will gain a broader perspective in life, maybe they’ll understand the essence of strength and courage from the victim, and for all we know, it could have been anyone’s child," she points out. "As a society, we should stop shaming and isolating victims, we should understand and support them and their families. Raise your voice for what’s important, for the things that matter, for the things that can help make this country a safer and better place to live," she adds.  
Body 2: 
Viewing all 16137 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>